Re: A note on spotting "bugs" [Was: ENOSPC after conversion]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12 December 2014 at 14:29, Robert White <rwhite@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> You yourself even found the annotation in the wiki that said you should have
> e4defragged the system before conversion.

There's no mention of e4defrag on the Btrfs wiki, it says to btrfs
defrag before balance to avoid ENOSPC, as the last step of conversion.


> What you are experiencing is a little vexing, but it's not a bug. It's not
> even a "huge problem". And if you'd stop banging your head against it it
> wouldn't be any sort of problem at all. Neither of us can change these
> facts.

I stopped banging my head several emails ago. I understand the problem
and I will start over.


> I feel your pain man, but thats about it.

I'm in no pain, it has been interesting. No data loss. No hurry.


> What more can I do?

The conversion wiki is lacking. It would be great if someone (maybe
you?) could expand upon the drawbacks of conversion.


> What is it that you want?

Nothing more.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux