Re: Balance & scrub & defrag

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Robert White <rwhite@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> You need to buy better disks. 8-)

Where can one buy these better disks with reasonable prices?-) Disks are
best thought of as consumables.

> I use SMART (smartmontools etc) and its tests to keep track of and
> warn me of such issues. It's way more likely to catch incipient media
> failures long before scrub would.

That may be sort of true, but I think even SMART is helped by the fact
that the media is read through from the beginning to the end*, so it can
detect even the errors that don't bubble through the IO layer. And BTRFS
can indeed note errors that the media doesn't - two checksums is better
than one checksum, assuming they aren't exactly the same algorithm ;).

Do you alternatively execute SMART self tests?

* scrub doesn't do this, it reads only through used data

-- 
  _____________________________________________________________________
     / __// /__ ____  __               http://www.modeemi.fi/~flux/\   \
    / /_ / // // /\ \/ /                                            \  /
   /_/  /_/ \___/ /_/\_\@modeemi.fi                                  \/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux