Re: Why is the actual disk usage of btrfs considered unknowable?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 12/07/2014 09:32 PM, ashford@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> In conclusion, the disk usage is well known; which is unknown is
>> > the space that is available to the user (who is uninterested to
>> > all the details inside a filesystem). The best that is doable
>> > is an estimation like the above one.

> I disagree.  My experiences with other file-systems, including ZFS, show
> that the most common solution is to just deliver to the user the actual
> amount of unused disk space.  Anything else changes this known value into
> a guess or prediction.

So in case you have a raid1 filesystem on two disks; each disk has 300GB
free; which is the free space that you expected: 300GB or 600GB and why ?


> 
> Peter Ashford

BR
G.Baroncelli
> 
> 


-- 
gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D  17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux