On 12/05/2014 08:26 AM, Duncan wrote: > Goffredo Baroncelli posted on Thu, 04 Dec 2014 19:39:37 +0100 as > excerpted: > >> To check if a device is a LVM snapshot, it is checked the 'udev' >> device property 'DM_UDEV_LOW_PRIORITY_FLAG' . If it is set to 1, >> the device has to be skipped. >> >> As consequence, btrfs now depends also by the libudev. > > Not being a coder I gotta ask... > > How does this patch deal with mdev (busybox) or static dev instead of > udev? Does it gracefully degrade to legacy LVM-agnostic behavior? My patch no; of course we can put some #ifdef to make it an option. [dropped the part related to systemd ....] -- gpg @keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli <kreijackATinwind.it> Key fingerprint BBF5 1610 0B64 DAC6 5F7D 17B2 0EDA 9B37 8B82 E0B5 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
