Re: [RFC PATCH] Btrfs: add sha256 checksum option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Alex Elsayed <eternaleye@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> https://github.com/openssl/openssl/blob/master/crypto/sha/asm/sha1-armv8.pl
>
> #             hardware-assisted software(*)
> # Apple A7    2.31              4.13 (+14%)
> # Cortex-A53  2.19              8.73 (+108%)
> # Cortex-A57  2.35              7.88 (+74%)


Note that those are showing 2 cycles per byte.

> From the CityHash readme, on a Xeon X5550 (which is _considerably_ more
> powerful than any of the above):
>
> On a single core of a 2.67GHz Intel Xeon X5550, CityHashCrc256 peaks at
> about 5 to 5.5 bytes/cycle.

5 bytes per cycle is 0.2 cycles per byte. So your own citation shows
that CityHash is 10 times faster.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux