Please ignore this patch, Chris has fixed this problem.
Thanks
Miao
On Mon, 1 Dec 2014 18:04:13 +0800, Miao Xie wrote:
> If we failed to reading out the checksum, we would free all the checksums
> in the list. But the current code accessed the list head, not the entry
> in the list. Fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Miao Xie <miaox@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index 783a943..c26b58f 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -413,7 +413,8 @@ int btrfs_lookup_csums_range(struct btrfs_root *root, u64 start, u64 end,
> ret = 0;
> fail:
> while (ret < 0 && !list_empty(&tmplist)) {
> - sums = list_entry(&tmplist, struct btrfs_ordered_sum, list);
> + sums = list_first_entry(&tmplist, struct btrfs_ordered_sum,
> + list);
> list_del(&sums->list);
> kfree(sums);
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
