-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: Crazy idea of cleanup the inode_record btrfsck things with SQL?
From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@xxxxxxx>
To: <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2014年12月01日 13:47
Qu Wenruo posted on Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:24:50 +0800 as excerpted:
The db file is mostly used in memory, only when the metadata is really
really big, maybe when the fs tree's level is 7 or 8 we may need to use
db file.
So fscking the database in ordered to fsck the database isn't an issue.
One objection down! =:^)
But seriously, the politics of the idea remains its biggest nemesis in my
opinion. And in systemd we've unfortunately a live demonstration of just
how big a nemesis that can be. =:^( If the technical reasoning for it
is sound and the benefit high enough, great, but IMO the benefit will
need to be pretty high to justify the risk of political fallout, and I
doubt it's anything close to that high. But it's not my call, so we'll
see. Thinks could certainly get interesting if it's judged to be worth
it. < Checking popcorn stash >
No (systemd civilian) war, make love!
I seldom consider the politics problem of the insane idea even the
systemd warfare is still here.
(Emmm, maybe it is because Arch accept systemd too long time ago without
too much problem?)
Anyway, it is just an insane idea and any feedback killing the seed of
insanity as soon as possible is welcomed.
Thanks,
Qu
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
