Re: Crazy idea of cleanup the inode_record btrfsck things with SQL?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Qu Wenruo posted on Mon, 01 Dec 2014 11:24:50 +0800 as excerpted:

> The db file is mostly used in memory, only when the metadata is really
> really big, maybe when the fs tree's level is 7 or 8 we may need to use
> db file.

So fscking the database in ordered to fsck the database isn't an issue.  
One objection down! =:^)

But seriously, the politics of the idea remains its biggest nemesis in my 
opinion.  And in systemd we've unfortunately a live demonstration of just 
how big a nemesis that can be.  =:^(  If the technical reasoning for it 
is sound and the benefit high enough, great, but IMO the benefit will 
need to be pretty high to justify the risk of political fallout, and I 
doubt it's anything close to that high.  But it's not my call, so we'll 
see.  Thinks could certainly get interesting if it's judged to be worth 
it.  < Checking popcorn stash >

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux