The rcu_string returned by rcu_string_strdup isn't technically under RCU yet,
and it makes more sense not to treat it as such. Additionally, an rcu_string
passed to rcu_string_free should already be rcu_dereferenced and therefore not
in the __rcu address space.
Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
include/linux/rcustring.h | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcustring.h b/include/linux/rcustring.h
index 67277ab..28bd9bc 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcustring.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcustring.h
@@ -37,8 +37,7 @@ struct rcu_string {
* @src: The string to copy
* @flags: Flags for kmalloc
*/
-static inline struct rcu_string __rcu *rcu_string_strdup(const char *src,
- gfp_t flags)
+static inline struct rcu_string *rcu_string_strdup(const char *src, gfp_t flags)
{
struct rcu_string *ret;
size_t len = strlen(src) + 1;
@@ -54,7 +53,7 @@ static inline struct rcu_string __rcu *rcu_string_strdup(const char *src,
* rcu_string_free() - free an RCU string
* @str: The string
*/
-static inline void rcu_string_free(struct rcu_string __rcu *str)
+static inline void rcu_string_free(struct rcu_string *str)
{
if (str)
kfree_rcu(str, rcu);
--
2.1.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
