On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 12:23 AM, Holger Hoffstätte <holger.hoffstaette@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Would there be room for a compromise with e.g. 128 bits? For example, Spooky V2 hash is 128 bits and is very fast. It is noncryptographic, but it is more than adequate for data checksums. http://burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/spooky.html SnapRAID uses this hash, and it runs at about 15 GB/sec on my machine (Xeon E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50Ghz) -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
