-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 11/21/2014 04:12 PM, Robert White wrote: > Here's a bug from 2005 of someone having a problem with the ACPI > IDE support... That is not ACPI "emulation". ACPI is not used to access the disk, but rather it has hooks that give it a chance to diddle with the disk to do things like configure it to lie about its maximum size, or issue a security unlock during suspend/resume. > People debating the merits of the ACPI IDE drivers in 2005. No... that's not a debate at all; it is one guy asking if he should use IDE or "ACPI" mode... someone who again meant AHCI and typed the wrong acronym. > Even when you "get me" for referencing windows, you're still > wrong... > > How many times will you try get out of being hideously horribly > wrong about ACPI supporting disk/storage IO? It is neither "recent" > nor "rare". > > How much egg does your face really need before you just see that > your fantasy that it's "new" and uncommon is a delusional mistake? Project much? It seems I've proven just about everything I originally said you got wrong now so hopefully we can be done. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJUcQj4AAoJENRVrw2cjl5RwmcH+gOW0LUQE4OXEToMY33brK8Z QMKw7T1y4dtXIeeWihugNs+vbwmoI2Wheeej4WPdiqvgqIfX4ov9+N9Nb39JiIsI 7frPJ638n98Et5sirCGKfaVvDTwlF85ApHHtXrVLg2dBY3A+oLM9jVU7jpRBvW1m IFjhJH/SMGDpMhix9SFg6w6cALRh1U5WYV4zMZ1f5/ri/05TYmNJ/M23cjtBicPZ LaIFxOMGef4lylysNaVh0W03424oIJit6d7DB1gxCyjnkUvVuJ43NjuS5ay+y2sP FFrepKrOfhK1oOib9e63zNfRHhWrX4KN0Dqcu/3+/+lhD3q5G1fd4YK2RV/oaso= =nm9l -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
