On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 01:27:13AM +0000, WorMzy Tykashi wrote: > I found a bit of a weird corner-case today. [1] It seems that, due to > the use of a 64-byte constant (ARGV0_BUF_SIZE) in utils.c, some tests > fail with a "buffer overflow detected" error if the progs are built in > a location with a sufficiently long path. Ouch, thanks for the report. The correct fix is IMO to extend the buffer to PATH_MAX plus what you propose as fix. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
