On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 12:47:35PM +0100, Karel Zak wrote: > What I see critical is missing ./configure, because it's pretty ugly > to add hardcoded dependencies (e.g. libudev), there is also no checks > for another libs, Makefile does not care about place where libs are > installed, header files, etc. etc. It does, prefix and libdir are set conditionally, DESTDIR works. > Is there any fundamental problem with autoconf? If no, then I'm ready > to send patches with some autotools stuff. Comments? Yeah the build dependencies checks would be nice, there's no problem with autoconf. The Makefile has been manualy crafted and supports some macro magic to build several binaries from one rule, static targets, quiet/verbose build. I want to preserve all of this so transition to automake may take time (or may not happen in the end). -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
