Re: BTRFS balance segfault, where to go from here

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 9:12 AM, E V <eliventer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I've seen dead locks on 3.16.3. Personally, I'm staying with 3.14
> until something newer stabilizes, haven't had any issues with it. You
> might want to try the latest 3.14, though I think there should be a
> new one pretty soon with quite a few btrfs patches.

Yeah, I forget what drove me to switch to a newer kernel, but I'm
wishing I had stuck with 3.14.  The last set of stable kernels has
been a pretty rough ride.  :)

My sense browsing the list is that the activity level has picked up a
bit, and that might be why 3.15-17 have been a bit more bug-ridden
than is normal.  For the long-term it is actually a good sign for the
vitality of btrfs.

But, I'll probably track 3.17 until a new longterm is announced and be
a bit more conservative.

--
Rich
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux