Re: Poll: time to switch skinny-metadata on by default?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/17/2014 08:30 AM, Petr Janecek wrote:
Hello,

the core of skinny-metadata feature has been merged in 3.10 (Jun 2013)
and has been reportedly used by many people. No major bugs were reported
lately unless I missed them.

   so far I haven't succeeded running btrfs balance on a large
skinny-metadata fs -- segfault, kernel bug, reproducible.  No such
problems on ^skinny-metadata fs (same disks, same data).  Tried both
several times on 3.17.  More info in comments 10,14 in
https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v1/url?u=https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id%3D64961&k=ZVNjlDMF0FElm4dQtryO4A%3D%3D%0A&r=cKCbChRKsMpTX8ybrSkonQ%3D%3D%0A&m=3qxE39iiu%2BoZB%2F05dE7hnGHZojWhjjijrtjNYki0NFg%3D%0A&s=b262347a1ad2505ebdcb21dcc9f0944a14c174a1dcf447746ce196faddd99092



I can't reproduce this, how big is your home directory, and are you still seeing corruptions after just rsyncing to a clean fs? Thanks,

Josef

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux