On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 08:46:14AM +0800, Anand Jain wrote:
[...]
> Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for the detailed changelog, the patch fixes xfstests/btrfs/006
failure, previously:
@@ -1,6 +1,10 @@
== QA output created by 006
== Set filesystem label to TestLabel.006
+ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdc2' - File exists
+ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdc3' - File exists
== Get filesystem label
+ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdc2' - File exists
+ERROR: device scan failed '/dev/sdc3' - File exists
though I now see another message (but haven't analyzed the cause yet):
@@ -22,18 +22,21 @@
<NUMDEVS> [SCRATCH_DEV].read_io_errs <NUM>
<NUMDEVS> [SCRATCH_DEV].write_io_errs <NUM>
== Show device stats by first/scratch dev
+ERROR: ioctl(BTRFS_IOC_GET_DEV_STATS) on �oh failed: No such device
[SCRATCH_DEV].corruption_errs <NUM>
[SCRATCH_DEV].flush_io_errs <NUM>
[SCRATCH_DEV].generation_errs <NUM>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html