If we change something while scanning fs-roots we need to redo our search so
that we get valid root items and have valid root cache. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
---
cmds-check.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/cmds-check.c b/cmds-check.c
index e81a26c..9522077 100644
--- a/cmds-check.c
+++ b/cmds-check.c
@@ -2171,7 +2171,7 @@ static int check_fs_roots(struct btrfs_root *root,
struct btrfs_path path;
struct btrfs_key key;
struct walk_control wc;
- struct extent_buffer *leaf;
+ struct extent_buffer *leaf, *tree_node;
struct btrfs_root *tmp_root;
struct btrfs_root *tree_root = root->fs_info->tree_root;
int ret;
@@ -2186,13 +2186,19 @@ static int check_fs_roots(struct btrfs_root *root,
memset(&wc, 0, sizeof(wc));
cache_tree_init(&wc.shared);
btrfs_init_path(&path);
-
+again:
key.offset = 0;
key.objectid = 0;
key.type = BTRFS_ROOT_ITEM_KEY;
ret = btrfs_search_slot(NULL, tree_root, &key, &path, 0, 0);
BUG_ON(ret < 0);
+ tree_node = tree_root->node;
while (1) {
+ if (tree_node != tree_root->node) {
+ free_root_recs_tree(root_cache);
+ btrfs_release_path(&path);
+ goto again;
+ }
leaf = path.nodes[0];
if (path.slots[0] >= btrfs_header_nritems(leaf)) {
ret = btrfs_next_leaf(tree_root, &path);
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
