Re: What is the vision for btrfs fs repair?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2014-10-10 19:43, Bob Marley wrote:
> On 10/10/2014 16:37, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> The fail safe behavior is to treat the known good tree root as the
>> default tree root, and bypass the bad tree root if it cannot be
>> repaired, so that the volume can be mounted with default mount options
>> (i.e. the ones in fstab). Otherwise it's a filesystem that isn't well
>> suited for general purpose use as rootfs let alone for boot.
>>
> 
> A filesystem which is suited for "general purpose" use is a filesystem
> which honors fsync, and doesn't *ever* auto-roll-back without user
> intervention.
> 

A file system cannot do anything about the *DISKS* not honouring a sync
command. That's what the PP was talking about.



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux