It is highly obnoxious to have to go put in a testdev when all you really want
is to run the quick image tests. Make this part optional so if we don't have a
testdev specified we just don't run that particular test. Thanks,
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@xxxxxx>
---
tests/fsck-tests.sh | 9 +++++----
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/fsck-tests.sh b/tests/fsck-tests.sh
index b783b78..867366b 100644
--- a/tests/fsck-tests.sh
+++ b/tests/fsck-tests.sh
@@ -24,10 +24,6 @@ run_check()
rm -f $RESULT
-if [ -z $TEST_DEV ] || [ -z $TEST_MNT ];then
- _fail "please set TEST_DEV and TEST_MNT"
-fi
-
# test rely on corrupting blocks tool
run_check make btrfs-corrupt-block
@@ -45,6 +41,11 @@ do
run_check $here/btrfsck test.img
done
+if [ -z $TEST_DEV ] || [ -z $TEST_MNT ];then
+ echo " [NOTRUN] extent tree rebuild"
+ exit 0
+fi
+
# test whether fsck can rebuild a corrupted extent tree
test_extent_tree_rebuild()
{
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
