On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 22:36 -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote: > printk returns an integer; there's no reason for printk_ratelimited to swallow > it. > > Signed-off-by: Omar Sandoval <osandov@xxxxxxxxxxx> > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- I'd prefer to keep it the way it is actually. I've submitted several patches to convert the int return to void for printk derived functions recently. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
