Re: [PATCH] Btrfs-progs: let btrfs-image actually work on a balanced fs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 09/25/2014 05:44 PM, Zach Brown wrote:
--- a/btrfs-image.c
+++ b/btrfs-image.c
@@ -1020,6 +1020,9 @@ static int copy_tree_blocks(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *eb,
  	int i = 0;
  	int ret;

+	if (btrfs_header_bytenr(eb) == 65536)
+		printf("We have bytenr 65536, belongs to %llu, level %d\n",
+		       btrfs_header_owner(eb), btrfs_header_level(eb));
  	ret = add_extent(btrfs_header_bytenr(eb), root->leafsize, metadump, 0);
  	if (ret) {
  		fprintf(stderr, "Error adding metadata block\n");

Did you mean to leave that in?  The raw super offset sure makes it look
like debugging output.


Sigh sorry, thought I culled everything.  Thanks,

Josef

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux