Re: 3.16 Managed to ENOSPC with <80% used

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 25 Sep 2014 17:05:11 -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:

> Deleting files or dropping snapshots is difficult when it's wedged as
> well, a lot of disk activity (journal thrash?) and no persistent
> progress - a reboot brigs the deleted files back.  I eventually
> managed to empty a single data chunk and after that it was a trivial
> recovery.

That's why I mentioned adding a second device - that will immediately
allow cleanup with headroom. An additional 8GB tmpfs volume can works
wonders.

>> That particular workload seems to cause the block allocator to go
>> on a spending spree; you're not the first to see this.
> 
> I could see normal-user usage patterns getting ignored, but this is
> the patterns of the people working on BTRFS.   Maybe they need to
> remove their balance cronjobs for a while. :)

Well..some remedy is coming:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/mason/linux-btrfs.git/commit/fs/btrfs?h=integration&id=47ab2a6c689913db23ccae38349714edf8365e0a

Not sure how many preliminaries that patch needs, but if you are
comfortable with patching/building your kernel you could give that
a try. I'm sure Josef would love some feedback.

Glad you're back on track. :)

Holger

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux