On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 12:22:57PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> On 09/19/2014 12:05 PM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 11:47:53AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 09/19/2014 11:45 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 02:01:28AM -0700, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> >>>> This patch series moves the generic RCU string library used internally by BTRFS
> >>>> to be accessible by anyone. It provides printk_in_rcu and
> >>>> printk_ratelimited_in_rcu to print these strings. In order to avoid a weird
> >>>> inconsistency between the two, the first patch fixes printk_ratelimited so it
> >>>> passes on the return value from printk.
> >>>>
> >>>> The second patch actually moves the RCU string library. Version 2 passes on the
> >>>> return values from printk{,_ratelimited} and fixes some style issues.
> >>>>
> >>>> Omar Sandoval (2):
> >>>
> >>> For the series:
> >>>
> >>> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> Fine by me too, Paul, do you want to merge it in?
> >
> > I would be happy to.
> >
> > Are you thinking in terms of 3.18 or 3.19? These look OK either way, but
> > thought I should check.
>
> Either way is fine with me. Actually this will have minor conflicts
> with my current branch headed for-next, so I can resolve and send as a
> stand alone pull.
There are no conflicts with RCU, just adding a file, so I am just as
happy to have you send this via your tree.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
