On 21 September 2014 03:01, Dimitri John Ledkov <xnox@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Inspect arguments, if we are not called as btrfs, then assume we are
> called to act like fsck.
[...]
> - if (!strcmp(bname, "btrfsck")) {
> + if (strcmp(bname, "btrfs") != 0) {
That's assuming a lot.
Silently (!) breaking people's btrfs-3.15_patched-DontRandomlyPanicV2
is a recipe for needless hair-pulling. Is there a reason for not using
something less like strstr(bname, "fsck") that I am missing?
Regards,
T G-R
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
