Le vendredi 19 septembre 2014, 13:18:34 Rob Spanton a écrit : > I have a particularly uncomplicated setup (a desktop PC with a hard > disk) and I'm seeing particularly slow performance from btrfs. Weeelll I have the same over-complicated kind of setup, and an Arch Linux BTRFS system which used to boot in some decent amout of time in the past now takes about 5 full minutes to just make it to the KDM login prompt, and another 5 minutes before KDE is fully started. Makes me think of the good ole' times of Windows 95 OSR2 on a 486SX with a dying 1 GB Hard disk... Now, let me add that I had removed all snaphots, ran a full defrag, and even rebalanced the damn thing without any positive effect... (And yes, my HD is physically in good shape, SMART feels fully happy, and it's less than 75% full...) I've been using BTRFS for 2-3 years on a dozen of different systems, and if something doesn't surprise me at all, it's « slow performance », indeed, although I'm myself more accustomed to « incredibly fscking damn slow performance »... HTH -- Swâmi Petaramesh <swami@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> http://petaramesh.org PGP 9076E32E Un homme ne doit pas avaler plus de bobards qu'il ne peut en digérer. -- Henry Brooks Adams -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
