On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 01:39:49 +0800
Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> On 16/09/2014 01:14, Johannes Hirte wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 2014 20:32:58 +0800
> > Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Hi Johannes,
> >>
> >> Can I have you this tested.. ? Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >> -------
> >> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >> index e9676a4..1224b61 100644
> >> --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >> +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
> >> @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ static noinline int device_list_add(const char
> >> *path,
> >> * the btrfs dev scan cli, after FS has been
> >> mounted. */
> >> if (fs_devices->opened) {
> >> - return -EBUSY;
> >> + goto out;
> >> } else {
> >> /*
> >> * That is if the FS is _not_ mounted
> >> and if you @@ -566,6 +566,7 @@ static noinline int
> >> device_list_add(const char *path, if (!fs_devices->opened)
> >> device->generation = found_transid;
> >>
> >> +out:
> >> *fs_devices_ret = fs_devices;
> >>
> >> return ret;
> >> -------
> >
> > With this change, it works again without initramfs.
>
> Thanks. I am bit confused, is there any configuration that is
> still not working, even with the above changes.
>
> Anand
At moment, I'm not aware of any. But I will test the remaining systems
I have.
regards,
Johannes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
