On Mon, 8 Sep 2014, Austin S Hemmelgarn <ahferroin7@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Also, I've found out the hard way that system chunks really should be > RAID1, NOT RAID10, otherwise it's very likely that the filesystem > won't mount at all if you lose 2 disks. Why would that be different? In a RAID-1 you expect system problems if 2 disks fail, why would RAID-10 be different? Also it would be nice if there was a N-way mirror option for system data. As such data is tiny (32MB on the 120G filesystem in my workstation) the space used by having a copy on every disk in the array shouldn't matter. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
