Re: [PATCH] btrfs-progs: readahead errors are not fatal

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:16:03AM -0700, Zach Brown wrote:
> Seems like this is already leaking a refcount and only returns 0..  so
> maybe remove the bug_on something like this totally untested patch?

Looks much better than my patch, I'm taking it.

> There's another "#if 0"-ed out caller in extent-tree.c but that nonsense
> should just be removed.

Indeed, looking at the commit that added "#if 0", we're not interested
in the code anymore, feel free to kill it.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux