Re: fallocate fail on btrfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



And the strace of fallocate execution against a zero-length file I
created with touch:
http://sprunge.us/BRML

You can see in the strace that fallocate thinks it worked (= 0), but
here's the file post-execution:
2014-08-27 15:49:45
root@eanna i ~ # ls -alh test.test
-rw------- 1 root root 0 Aug 27 15:46 test.test

On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 3:39 PM, G. Richard Bellamy
<rbellamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Also, here's the strace of the fallocate call:
> http://sprunge.us/QXFN
>
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:39 AM, G. Richard Bellamy
> <rbellamy@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Good questions, should have included that info in the OP.
>>
>> The current versions I can get, but I'm frankly terrified to try to
>> roll back to prior versions to "test" this, since back in that land be
>> monsters with deadlocks preventing degraded volumes from being fixed
>> and other challenges I wasn't qualified to fix - and it was over three
>> months ago that I tried fallocate last. I run Arch and aggressively
>> update, so I can infer what those version were, and will do so, though
>> I know that is of limited efficacy in helping you help me...
>>
>> Best-guess Prior (2014-06-30):
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> linux-lts 3.10.45-1
>> btrfs-progs 3.14.2-2
>> linux 3.15.2-1
>> util-linux 2.24.2-1
>>
>> Current (2014-08-27 10:28:07):
>> -----------
>> rbellamy@eanna i ~ % pacman -Q linux-lts btrfs-progs-git linux util-linux
>> linux-lts 3.14.17-1
>> btrfs-progs-git 3.16_108_d34cbe7-1
>> linux 3.16.1-1
>> util-linux 2.25-3
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:39 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> G. Richard Bellamy posted on Tue, 26 Aug 2014 22:05:01 -0700 as excerpted:
>>>
>>>> When I try to run fallocate with "--keep-size" on my btrfs partitions,
>>>> it's failing, and I'm at a loss as to why. This was working in prior
>>>> versions.
>>>>
>>>> Any suggestions on how to attack this problem? I'm betting I'm missing
>>>> something simple here, and have just gone down the rabbit hole...
>>>>
>>>> BTW, I've confirmed that the line that fails is fallocate.c:368 [2],
>>>> with "open" always returning -1.
>>>
>>> One "something simple" you're missing (either that or I am) is any
>>> reference to which version you're running.  You say it was working in
>>> prior versions, but /which/ prior versions, and /which/ version doesn't
>>> work now?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
>>> "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
>>> and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
>>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux