On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 09:29:56AM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 8/21/14, 3:44 AM, Anand Jain wrote: > > > > > > A long time back there was an attempt to remove it but > > this avoided it. Pls ref to the link in this discussion. > > > > https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg27272.html > > Hm, I guess I don't understand this. How is udev related to whether > or not /proc/partitions is sufficient vs. recursive /dev? The argument about udev is probably invalid, /proc/filesystem is populated by kernel afaics. > To be clear, my patchset keeps the -d / --all-devices option. > > It simply discovers all devices via /proc/partitions, not via > a full /dev tree walk. I'm fine with that. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
