Personally, if doing development, compiling from latest stable or
integration kernel is my choice.
But if not developing the codes, I prefer Arch's core repo, which is
about 1~2 weeks late than the stable release.
Although somewhat late, but still much newer than most distros' stable repo.
(I also used to use Gentoo, but even with ccache, compiling everything
is somewhat time killing and overkilled for me)
Thanks,
Qu
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Distro vs latest kernel for BTRFS?
From: Shriramana Sharma <samjnaa@xxxxxxxxx>
To: linux-btrfs <linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2014年08月22日 19:59
Hello. I've seen repeated advices to use the latest kernel. While
hearing of the recent compression bug affecting recent kernels does
somewhat warn one off the previous advice, I would like to know what
people who are running regular distros do to get the latest kernel.
Personally I'm on Kubuntu, which provides mainline kernels till a
particular point but not beyond that.
Do people here always compile the latest kernel themselves just to get
the latest BTRFS stability fixes (and improvements, though as a
second priority)?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
