On 8/19/14, 10:33 AM, Liu Bo wrote: > The crash is > > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/extent_io.c:2124! > [...] > Workqueue: btrfs-endio normal_work_helper [btrfs] > RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa02d6055>] [<ffffffffa02d6055>] end_bio_extent_readpage+0xb45/0xcd0 [btrfs] > > This is in fact a regression. It'd be helpful to identify the commit, or at least kernel release, which caused the regression. > It is because we forgot to increase @offset properly in reading corrupted block, > so that the @offset remains, and this leads to checksum errors while reading > left blocks queued up in the same bio, and then ends up with hiting the above > BUG_ON. So does that mean that any checksum error on this path will crash the kernel? That sounds like this bug has exposed a more fundamental problem, no? Thanks, -Eric > Reported-by: Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c > index 3af4966..be41e4d 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c > @@ -2602,6 +2602,7 @@ static void end_bio_extent_readpage(struct bio *bio, int err) > test_bit(BIO_UPTODATE, &bio->bi_flags); > if (err) > uptodate = 0; > + offset += len; > continue; > } > } > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
