Re: Questions on using BtrFS for fileserver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 08/19/2014 06:21 PM, M G Berberich wrote:> · Are there any
reports/papers/web-pages about BtrFS-systems this size
>   in use? Praises, complains, performance-reviews, whatever…

I don't know about papers or benchmarks but few weeks ago there was a
guy who has problem with really long mounting with btrfs with similiar size.
https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg36226.html

And I would not recommend 3TB disks. *I'm not btrfs dev* but as far as I
know there is a quite different between rebuilding disk on real RAID and
btrfs RAID. The problem is btrfs has RAID on filesystem level not on hw
level so there is bigger mechanical overheat on drives and thus it take
significantli longer than regular RAID.

--
b.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux