(2014/08/12 17:30), Satoru Takeuchi wrote: > From: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Just fix the following misformatting in 'man btrfs-replace'. Please ignore this patch. It's part of the following Qu's patch. https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg36116.html In addition, to make matters worse, I've reviewed and tested this patch ;-( https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-btrfs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg36206.html Satoru > > =============================================================================== > -f > force using and overwriting <targetdev> even if it looks like containing > a valid btrfs filesystem. > > A valid filesystem is assumed if a btrfs superblock is found which > contains a correct checksum. Devices which are currently mounted are never > allowed to be used as the <targetdev>. -B:::: no background replace. > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > =============================================================================== > > Signed-off-by: Satoru Takeuchi <takeuchi_satoru@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt b/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt > index eecf9b0..476e351 100644 > --- a/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt > +++ b/Documentation/btrfs-replace.txt > @@ -49,6 +49,7 @@ containing a valid btrfs filesystem. > A valid filesystem is assumed if a btrfs superblock is found which contains a > correct checksum. Devices which are currently mounted are > never allowed to be used as the <targetdev>. > ++ > -B:::: > no background replace. > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
