Re: Ideas for a feature implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Aug 13, 2014, at 5:01 AM, David Pottage <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> At present, you can write RAID 5 or 6 data, but if anything goes wrong, btrfs cannot use the parity information to help you get your data back, so in general you are better off with RAID 1 or 10.

Btrfs RAID5/6 normally mounted will reconstruct data from parity if there's a data checksum mismatch indicating data block(s) are corrupt. It'll also reconstruct from parity in the case of degraded mounts, and when doing a balance. What's missing is scrub.


> Also, I don't think I/O done in parallel so you get no speed advantage from having multiple discs either.

Hmm I thought that was just single and raid1?


Chris Murphy--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux