Hi Jim, > To any core btrfs devs who are listening and care - the unreliability of > btrfs send/receive is IMO the single biggest roadblock to adoption of btrfs > as a serious next-gen FS. For you it are send/receive deficiencies, however there are many other feature/enhancement requests having top priority for other users. Fact is, just crying for improvements won't make things better - if you want a feature/enhancement done, you have several options: - Implement/fix it yourself - Go to your distribution provider with whom you have a support contract and make him implement what you would like to see - Sponsor somebody yourself to get it sone. > with (very) occasional filesystem corruption... IF I can rely on replication > to keep my data safe on another box. Without the replication, there's just > no reasonable case to be made to replace ZFS. ... and now the usual ZFS comparison to make devs jealous ;) Best regards, Clemens -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
