Re: 40TB volume taking over 16 hours to mount, any ideas?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Aug 9, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Andy Smith <andy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 01:38:34PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Aug 2014 16:35:29 Jose Ildefonso Camargo Tolosa wrote:
>> > Then, after reading here and there, decided to try to use a newer
>> > kernel, tried 3.15.8.  Well, it is still mounting after ~16 hours, and
>> > I got messages like these at first:
>>
>> I recommend trying a 3.14 kernel.  I had ongoing problems with kernels before
>> 3.14 which included infinite loops in kernel space.  Based on reports on this
>> list I haven't been inclined to test 3.15 kernels.  But 3.14 has been working
>> well for me on many systems.
>
> I'm in a similar position with a filesystem that won't mount except
> read-only, but am already on 3.14 and am also wondering whether to
> try a 3.16 kernel.
>
>     https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81981
>
> Jose, maybe you could try -oro in the hope of at least getting back
> to a read-only mount?

Will try 3.14, ro would be "good enough" for me, provided that I can
resize the filesystem, if I can do that, I can create a new one, and
copy all data (hopefully faster than moving ~11TB of data through the
network).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux