On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 8:38 PM, ronnie sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Russell Coker <russell@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> >> Based on what I've read on this list it seems that BTRFS is less stable in >> 3.15 than in 3.14. Even 3.14 isn't something I'd recommend to random people >> who want something to just work. >> >> The Debian installer has BTRFS in a list of filesystems to choose with no >> special notice about it. I'm thinking of filing a Debian bug requesting that >> they put a warning against it. >> >> What do people here think? > > +1 for a warning. > > btrfs is still a young filesystem and not as stable as say ext4. > I think it would be very prudent to have a small warning. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html I agree here and feel this is very important. +1 Nick -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
