Russell Coker posted on Tue, 05 Aug 2014 22:20:33 +1000 as excerpted: > The Debian installer has BTRFS in a list of filesystems to choose with > no special notice about it. I'm thinking of filing a Debian bug > requesting that they put a warning against it. > > What do people here think? You already have my general feeling, a warning is still appropriate. For Debian, I believe it's fair to characterize people running stable as relatively conservative. As such, a warning may be appropriate, but if they're actually /that/ conservative, is it needed, or will user's natural inclinations to filesystem conservatism be enough, and a btrfs warning thus look more serious than it is? I'd say warn, unless that warning /will/ be seen as "eat your babies" level, even when it's more "appropriate care and a regular backup program recommended." -- Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs. "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master -- and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
