Hi Peter, On Mon, 4 Aug 2014 11:59:19 AM Peter Waller wrote: > On 4 August 2014 11:50, Chris Samuel <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > To be honest I'm not sure I'd suggest btrfs for production use at all at > > present, it's only recently been unmarked as experimental and to be honest > > I feel that was premature. > > Thanks for the honest answer. That's OK, I am enthusiastic about btrfs (being a pre-mainline merge user), but I don't think it serves it well to signal that it's more ready than it actually is. > There are very positive signals out there which I had perhaps taken > too literally. I'd love to see it become ready, there are a lot of things > about BTRFS which appeal greatly. So I hope I'm helping by trying > to make it clear the problems that I encountered. Oh indeed, please don't take my brief replies as being anything other than brief due to preparing to do some astronomy! :-) All the best, Chris -- Chris Samuel : http://www.csamuel.org/ : Melbourne, VIC -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
