Re: ENOSPC with mkdir and rename

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4 August 2014 11:39, Hugo Mills <hugo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> >  * btrfs fi df
>> >     - look at metadata used vs total. If these are close to zero (on
>> >       3.15+) or close to 512 MiB (on <3.15), then you are in danger of
>> >       ENOSPC.
>>
>> Hmm. It's unfortunate that this could indicate an amount of space
>> which is free when it actually isn't.
>
>    That's why the 512 MiB block reserve was split out of metadata --
> so that you don't look at metadata and say "oh, I've got half a gig
> free, that's OK".

I don't quite follow this. Is it a recent development I missed? When
was it "split out"? More recently than the software I'm using?
Otherwise I'm having difficulty parsing this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux