I've been running two backup servers, with 25T and 20T of data, using btrfs on bcache (writeback) for about 7 months. I periodically run btrfs scrubs and backup verifies (SHA1 hashes) and have never had a corruption issue. My use of btrfs is simple, though, with no subvolumes and no btrfs level raid. My bcache backing devices are LVM volumes that span multiple md raid6 arrays. So, either the bug has been fixed or my configuration is not susceptible. I'm running kernel 3.15.5-200.fc20.x86_64. --Larkin On 7/30/2014 5:04 PM, dptrash@xxxxxxxx wrote: > Concerning http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/31018, does this "bug" still exists? > > Kernel 3.14 > B: 2x HDD 1 TB > C: 1x SSD 256 GB > > # make-bcache -B /dev/sda /dev/sdb -C /dev/sdc --cache_replacement_policy=lru > # mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 -L "BTRFS_RAID" /dev/bcache0 /dev/bcache1 > > I still have no "incomplete page write" messages in "dmesg | grep btrfs" and the checksums of some manually reviewed files are okay. > > Who has more experiences about this? > > Thanks, > > - dp > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-bcache" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
