Re: Unstable v3.15-rc tags

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 22 July 2014 15:15, David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> The tags were meant to mark the points in time where different groups of
> patches were added to the to-be-v3.15, but then I noticed that one of
> the patches had my note in the subject and Qu sent an updated version
> anyway. So I had rebased the branch and all the tags became stale. I did
> not bother to move them as they did not work as expected.

Ah, thanks for clarifying. I wasn't particularly attached to the tags,
it just seemed odd that we got to rc4, then dropped back down to rc1.
I'll not pay too much attention to them in future.

>
> The patch flux is the good and bad habit of the integration repository.

It certainly makes for an interesting chart in gitk --all. :-D

Cheers,


WorMzy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux