Re: [PATCH 1/1] btrfs: looping 'mkfs.btrfs -f <dev>' may fail with EBUSY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/12/2014 02:25 PM, Anand Jain wrote:
The thread holding the O_EXCL flag seems to be BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV ioctl,
which in turn calls btrfs_scan_one_device() to open dev with the O_EXCL flag.

But btrfs_scan_one_device() does not write anything to the disk.
and it is called by
       . An intermediary step (not the final open_ctree) in the
         mount thread to read the SB and
       . btrfs-control ioctls viz BTRFS_IOC_SCAN_DEV and
         BTRFS_IOC_DEVICES_READY
they don't need the O_EXCL.

test script: (run this in a loop)
static int test_skip_this_disk(char *path)
{
     int fd;
     char c;

     printf("%s ", path);
     fd = open(path, O_RDWR|O_EXCL);
     if (fd < 0) {
         printf("Open failed\n");
         return 1;
     }
     /*fflush(stdout);
     printf("Open Fine press enter\n");
     scanf("%c", &c);*/
     close(fd);
     return 0;
}

main(int arg, char **argv)
{
     int i;

     if (arg == 1) {
         printf("usage: %s <dev-with-btrfs-sb> .. \n", argv[0]);
         exit(1);
     }

     for (i = 1; i < arg; i++)
         test_skip_this_disk(argv[i]);
}

dump stack after the userland close(fd)

dump_stack+0x9/0x60
btrfs_scan_one_device+0x18d/0x1f0 [btrfs]
btrfs_control_ioctl+0xb9/0x210 [btrfs]
do_vfs_ioctl+0x84/0x4c0
inode_has_perm+0x28/0x30
file_has_perm+0x8a/0xa0
SyS_ioctl+0x91/0xa0
system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 1 -
  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
index 636faa0..c186b5e 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -914,7 +914,6 @@ int btrfs_scan_one_device(const char *path, fmode_t flags, void *holder,
  	 * later supers, using BTRFS_SUPER_MIRROR_MAX instead
  	 */
  	bytenr = btrfs_sb_offset(0);
-	flags |= FMODE_EXCL;
I could not think whether it will cause some big problem if we remove this flag.
So Cc Chris and others.

Any ideas about this problem?

Thanks,
Wang
  	mutex_lock(&uuid_mutex);
bdev = blkdev_get_by_path(path, flags, holder);

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Filesystem Development]     [Linux NFS]     [Linux NILFS]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux