dev->name is null but missing flag is not set.
Strictly speaking the missing flag should have been set, but there
are more places where code just checks if name is null. For now this
patch does the same.
stack:
BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000064
IP: [<ffffffffa0228908>] btrfs_show_devname+0x58/0xf0 [btrfs]
[<ffffffff81198879>] show_vfsmnt+0x39/0x130
[<ffffffff81178056>] m_show+0x16/0x20
[<ffffffff8117d706>] seq_read+0x296/0x390
[<ffffffff8115aa7d>] vfs_read+0x9d/0x160
[<ffffffff8115b549>] SyS_read+0x49/0x90
[<ffffffff817abe52>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
reproducer:
mkfs.btrfs -draid1 -mraid1 /dev/sdg1 /dev/sdg2
btrfstune -S 1 /dev/sdg1
modprobe -r btrfs && modprobe btrfs
mount -o degraded /dev/sdg1 /btrfs
btrfs dev add /dev/sdg3 /btrfs
Signed-off-by: Anand Jain <Anand.Jain@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/super.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/super.c b/fs/btrfs/super.c
index 74ef9bf..cac015f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/super.c
@@ -1940,6 +1940,8 @@ static int btrfs_show_devname(struct seq_file *m, struct dentry *root)
list_for_each_entry(dev, head, dev_list) {
if (dev->missing)
continue;
+ if (!dev->name)
+ continue;
if (!first_dev || dev->devid < first_dev->devid)
first_dev = dev;
}
--
2.0.0.257.g75cc6c6
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
