On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 11:29:57AM -0700, Josef Bacik wrote:
> >I'm sure that filesystem is damaged in some way, but the kernel of course
> >should not crash.
> >
>
> I don't have this mail client setup right to send patches, can you just
> go into relocation.c in build_backref_tree and remove the need_check =
> false; statement and see if that fixes it. Thanks,
Sure, I'll try that tomorrow when I have access to that machine.
Just to be clear
1) You mean this one, right?
if (!upper->checked && need_check) {
need_check = false; <-- delete this
list_add_tail(&edge->list[UPPER],
&list);
} else
2) is your guess that the BUG_ON I'm getting shouldn't be triggered
and your proposed patch could fix that, or that I do have an FS problem
but that we're just going to make the kernel more lenient and not crash on it?
Thanks,
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
