On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 07:06:08AM +0000, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
> > If it annoys other people, maybe having a -q (quiet) that removes this
> > message would be useful?
>
> IMHO it should be the reverse: be quiet by default and require -v, just
> as more explicit behaviour also requires additional options.
> With default options I expect default behaviour. Telling me that the
> default behaviour happened is just noise.
So that's my general thought by default too :) but
1) I wanted to be nice :)
2) More generally I would have missed this new feature without the output
and I thought it might not be unreasonable to show it to draw attention to
it. But at the same time, I wouldn't complain if it were quiet by default.
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 03:09:53PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
> >as more explicit behaviour also requires additional options.
> >With default options I expect default behaviour. Telling me that the
> >default behaviour happened is just noise.
>
> Fair point, Another question is that current default output has been there.
> Let's Cc David, and see what is his opinion.
Thanks for taking the feedback.
Marc
--
"A mouse is a device used to point at the xterm you want to type in" - A.S.R.
Microsoft is to operating systems ....
.... what McDonalds is to gourmet cooking
Home page: http://marc.merlins.org/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
