On 06/16/2014 03:06 PM, Holger Hoffstätte wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2014 18:47:39 -0700, Marc MERLIN wrote:
On Mon, Jun 16, 2014 at 09:35:23AM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote:
On 06/15/2014 12:05 AM, Marc MERLIN wrote:
Taking snapshots is now output this in addition of the snapshot
operation.
Transaction commit: none (default)
1) Is that expected/normal? It looks kind of spamming/useless to me?
2) If it's useful, what's the use I'm not getting?
Addressed a issue that subvolumes reappear after deletetion if poweroff
happen.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg29547.html
I see, thank you for the pointer.
In the case of my script, it's console spam that I wish I could make go
away, but grep -v will do that for me :)
If it annoys other people, maybe having a -q (quiet) that removes this
message would be useful?
IMHO it should be the reverse: be quiet by default and require -v, just
as more explicit behaviour also requires additional options.
With default options I expect default behaviour. Telling me that the
default behaviour happened is just noise.
Fair point, Another question is that current default output has been there.
Let's Cc David, and see what is his opinion.
cheers
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
