On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 15:30:26 Swâmi Petaramesh wrote: > I just received a new laptop with a Micron 256GB SSD, and I plan to install > Fedora 20 onto it. > > I'm considering either BTRFS or ext4 (over LUKS-encrypted LVM) for this > machine, but I'm afraid BTRFS might generate too much writes and shorten the > SSD lifespan... Or am I mistaken ? http://etbe.coker.com.au/2014/04/27/swap-breaking-ssd/ I recently did some calculations based on the usage of workstations I run on SSD storage. While the main focus of my post was swap and SSD I also did the calculations for the supposed life of SSDs and BTRFS filesystem use (all workstations in question run BTRFS). My conclusion is that if the most conservative (pessimistic) claims about SSD life are correct then there's still nothing to worry about. Also I think that laptops tend to have less use than workstations, so unless your laptop is your main desktop system it should get less disk use than a typical workstation. http://etbe.coker.com.au/2014/05/12/btrfs-vs-lvm/ I don't believe that LVM offers any benefit if you use BTRFS. > Is there any pro/cons currently, on a 3.14 kernel, about using BTRFS along > with an SSD ? Apart from BTRFS being new and still a bit buggy, not at all. > Is there specific advice about leaf size, use of compression, snapshots, > (auto-)defrag etc, that might be relevant especially for SSDs ? SSDs being a lot faster than spinning media remove many of these issues. -- My Main Blog http://etbe.coker.com.au/ My Documents Blog http://doc.coker.com.au/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
