On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 05:59:56PM +0800, Wang Shilong wrote: > The reason that we allow partial opening is that sometimes, > we may have some corrupted trees.(for example extent tree), for > fsck repair case, the broken tree may be rebuilt later. > > So if users only want to do check but not repair anything, this > patch will make fsck return failure as soon as possible and > tell users that some critial roots have been corrupted. Ok, that partially answers my question under v1. This would be a different mode, eg. a fast check, that would bail out quickly as you intend. I'd really want to keep the (full) check and repair to do the same sort of checks and verification. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
